Subject: Unknown Subject

Letter from Benjamin Ekin[?] to Isaac Leeser, written in London on March 31, 1845. Ekin discusses a Mr. Solis, who brought a letter of introduction from Leeser and made a favorable impression. He mentions the publication of his letter in the Jewish Chronicle, its translation into other languages, and the ensuing sensation. He also addresses Leeser's December 30th letter, expressing willingness to discuss points of disagreement. Ekin refers to issues regarding Mr. Marks and mentions his daughter's engagement. The letter includes discussion of the denial of burial to Mr. H Montefiore. The letter is four pages on one sheet and includes a wax seal.

Letter from E. R. McGregor to Isaac Leeser discussing a complaint about the call of Marcussohn. McGregor mentions additional correspondence on the subject from Rev. Mr. Davis and Rev. C. D. Oliver, and includes Oliver's letter with his own remarks. The letter is written on one sheet of lined paper and marked "Private."

Letter from ElRm Gregor[?] to Isaac Leeser, written in New York City on October 5, 1852. The letter concerns an article in the October issue of *The Occident* about E. Marcussohn, who allegedly denied statements made in the August issue by Rev. J. C. Davis of Montgomery, Alabama. The writer disputes the veracity of Marcussohn's letter, stating that no such letter was received by the editor of the *Jewish Chronicle*. The writer asserts that Marcussohn either publicly converted to Christianity or was not the person who served as minister in Montgomery. The writer concludes by stating their intention to expose the truth of the matter, and that either Marcussohn or Leeser has been dishonest.

The letter questions the account given by E. Marcussohn in the October issue of *The Occident*, denying statements made in the August issue of the *Jewish Chronicle* about his conversion to Christianity. The writer, G. D. Bernheim, presents a series of ten points challenging Marcussohn's claims of remaining faithful to Judaism. He details interactions with Marcussohn, including a visit to Bernheim's home, and mentions receiving money from Marcussohn, and the provision of a letter of introduction to a reverend in Columbia, South Carolina. Bernheim suggests that Marcussohn's actions contradict his assertions of remaining Jewish and concludes that if all converted Jews acted like Marcussohn, there would be little hope for missionary work among Jews.

Letter from G. L. Lyon, secretary of the London Committee for the Appointment of a Minister to the Sydney Hebrew Congregation, to Isaac Leeser, editor of the Occident. Lyon requests Leeser to publish an advertisement for a minister in the Occident and to send two copies of the issue containing the advertisement, along with the bill.

A four-page letter from J. Peynada to Reverend Isaac Leeser, dated January 7, 1849. Peynada apologizes for the delay in responding to Leeser's letter and inquires about Leeser's health. The letter discusses the death of Mr. H. Belasstro, and critiques an article written by Mr. Goldberg in the Jewish Chronicle regarding Belasstro's death. Peynada also comments on other individuals and projects, including Mr. Hoga and a work on chronology, expressing concern about the lack of practical application of scholarly pursuits. The letter mentions Peynada's own contribution to the Occident, specifically a letter to Dr. McCourt. A significant portion of the letter is given over to reflecting on Belastro's death and the appropriate way to memorialize him.

Letter from Joseph Mitchell to Isaac Leeser regarding advertisements in the Jewish Chronicle for congregations in Mobile and Savannah. Mitchell includes an account for the advertisements and discusses the response to them, noting that young men, especially those without much money, may not be able to afford to spend a large sum on a venture. He also inquires about the forwarding of a copy of the Prose Essays on the Post Biblical History of the Jews.

Solomon Cohen writes to Isaac Leeser returning a letter from the editor of the Jewish Chronicle, and his reply. Cohen declines any further controversy, stating that he does not read the paper and lacks the time or inclination. He suggests that if Leeser publishes his reply, he should also publish the editor's letter.